| LAGUNA BEACH April 26, 2010 VOLUME XI |
|
News & Views
Debt Buyers & Sellers Resource
|
|
In This Edition
This month our feature article takes a look at the huge bank charge-offs and the seeming shortage of debt available to buyers in "Where Have All the Charge-offs Gone". The FTC has issued the 2010 Report on the FDCPA and Gary, shares a different (contrarian) view in "FDCPA Complaints in Perspective". With $trillion figures now routinely bandied about in conversations about national budgets and debt, we've gone through our own exercises to get our mind around what the figure actually represents and we share that in "$1.0 Trillion Explained". And, Jill provides some sources, most for free, that can help close any gaps in "Financial and Economic Literacy".
|
Where Have All the Charge-offs Gone?
by Gary Baker
2009 was a record breaking year for charged-off credit card accounts. The banks wrote off $83.27 Billion in credit card debt last year, and since credit card debt is harder to acquire right now, we were wondering where it all went.
In February 2010, the FTC issued a list of the top 9 Debt Buyers in the country and stated that these firms bought 75% of the charged off debt in the country. That percentage did not seem plausible, so we started a little investigation of our own to see if we could locate last year's charged-off inventory. We looked at the amount of charged-off accounts that were purchased by these firms from information we could locate. We also looked at about 30 other of the largest debt buyers, so that we could get an indication of how much of this $83 Billion in charge-offs we could locate. Although the results are only estimates, they are very surprising.
Starting with the Nine Largest Debt Buyers
According to the FTC, the nine largest debt buyers are: Arrow Financial Services LLC, Asta Funding Inc., B-Line LLC, eCast Settlement Corp., Encore Capital Group Inc., NCO Portfolio Management Inc., Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C., Sherman Financial Group LLC, and Cincinnati-based Unifund Corp. Of this list, three are public companies, another only buys bankruptcies, one firm was acquired by Sallie May and decided to exit the debt buying business, and one company is now owned by Chase Bank. In reviewing the SEC filings for the three public companies, we can determine how much debt was purchased by them in 2009. NCO also posts their 2009 debt purchases, so now we need to find the amount of debt purchased by the two remaining firms to determine the total amount purchased by these nine companies.
Many of the companies listed here, buy more than fresh credit card charge-offs. Our research shows that there is still about $42.3 billion of 2008 credit card debt, plus $22.6 billion of 2007, plus $12.7 billion of 2006, and $8.0 billion of 2005 credit card debt still uncollected from past years and in the marketplace somewhere. This does not include the mortgages, auto loans, medical, student loans, telecom, checks and payday loans that are also acquired by debt buyers.
Since some of the companies do not provide information on what debt that they purchased, but did provide information about revenues, we could make some comparisons against other similar companies to determine a likely amount of debt purchased. For many of the debt buyers who did not make the top 9 list, we were able to review their websites and determine the average amount of debt purchased by these firms based on the data that was provided. As we will see, a vast amount of the debt that was charged-off in 2009 is not accounted for.
Our Research
We looked tracked down the largest debt buyers and found 42 who have either made the largest debt buyers list since 2002 which is published annually by Collections & Credit Risk (CCR), or who were generally known to be larger buyers of debt. Five of these companies were eliminated because they were based in another country and bought debt abroad, one was acquired, one was shut down and one is a part of one of the public companies. Another company also exited the debt buying business in 2009. When we subtract the three companies on the FTC list who are not purchasing credit card debt, or are now part of other companies, we are left with 35 large debt buyers in the country. Some of these firms are purchasing as little as $200 million per year and others are buying in quantities of $1.0 to $2.0 Billion or more. There were six companies that we could not find any purchasing information on, but in most cases we were able to locate revenues, news articles and previous ranking information, where we could develop an estimation of the debt being purchased.
As previously mentioned, not all of the debt being purchased is fresh charge-offs. Even the public companies buy more than fresh and some companies are buyers of student loans, auto deficiencies, telecom etc., and the purchasing percentages between asset classes is almost never revealed. In other cases the company may have reported purchasing so many billions since 2002 for example. With so many holes in the data it was really a challenge to determine a figure at all. With some very good data points of reliable information we were able to determine that the major debt buyers purchased about $42.3 billion dollars worth of inventory last year (2009). Interestingly, this is almost the same amount of credit card accounts that were charged-off by the banks in 2008. According to CCR, the top 11 debt buyers, acquiring $28.2 billion of these accounts in 2008.
This left us still wondering where all the other accounts that were charged off in 2009 are. Since the total charge-off was reported at $83.27 billion in 2009, and we can account for roughly less than $42.3 billion in all credit card debt purchases, that leaves over $41 billion in face value not accounted for. (The figure is really much higher because not all the purchases were fresh charge-offs). This is more than half the 2009 charge-offs and some estimates say the real number may be closer to 70% of the debt written-off by the banks is still owned by those issuers and being collected by them, or is being warehoused until the debt prices improve. (There is speculation that there may also be a shortage of fresh debt currently available to be acquired by debt buyers, who were not part of a forward flow, in order to escalate the pricing).
Most debt buyers have learned not to pay too much for their inventory, particularly those who may have been burned by some of last years forward flow arrangements. Recovery rates are still very low, and financing is generally still difficult to obtain. Yet there is also a fair amount of older debt still on the market, and for many this has ultimately been more profitable than the fresh portfolios in this economy. The trouble that we see with so much debt being held by the banks is twofold: First, without being marketed there is no real price discovery or way to determine the current market value of these accounts, so when this debt finally does hits the street, it could be in such a volume that the prices collapse. (Unless the banks' new business model is to collect themselves) The second problem is that the charge-off rates have not declined at all this year. So, 2010 write-offs are also piling up. If we are on track for the same level of debt purchases this year as we were in 2009, with the same level or higher of charge-off rates, how does all this new debt get serviced or does it get warehoused, too?
Clearly the collection industry was not sized to service this entire amount of inventory and maybe only a portion is really being worked. Considering that the amount of charge-offs more than doubled between 2008 and 2009, and many of those 2008 and 2009 accounts are still in collections, plus the 2010 accounts now being worked. In addition the 2005, 2006 and 2007 accounts still being collected. We calculate the actual debt in circulation to be about $164 billion of credit card accounts in collections (or storage), and credit cards only make up about 24% of the entire collection industry. I think Apollo 13 said it best: "Ah Houston, I think we have a problem."
|
|
Credit Card Charge-offs
by Gary Baker
It appears that there was little change from last month in the charge-off rates. We added another chart that graphically compares last year's charge-offs to the unemployment rate.
|
Credit
|
Bank
|
American
|
Capital
|
Discover
|
JP
|
Citigroup
|
Credit
|
Jobless
|
|
Card
|
of
|
Express
|
One
|
|
Morgan
|
|
Card
|
Rate
|
|
Issuer
|
America
|
|
|
|
Chase
|
|
Industry
|
|
|
Feb. 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
Feb. 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.51%
|
4.5%
|
|
Feb. 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.59%
|
4.8%
|
|
Aug. 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.82%
|
6.2%
|
|
Feb-09
|
|
8.70%
|
8.06%
|
|
6.35%
|
9.33%
|
8.82%
|
8.1%
|
|
Mar-09
|
9.31%
|
8.80%
|
9.33%
|
7.39%
|
7.13%
|
9.66%
|
9.30%
|
8.5%
|
|
Apr-09
|
10.47%
|
10.10%
|
8.56%
|
8.26%
|
8.07%
|
10.21%
|
9.97%
|
8.9%
|
|
May-09
|
12.50%
|
10.40%
|
9.41%
|
8.91%
|
8.36%
|
10.50%
|
10.62%
|
9.4%
|
|
Jun-09
|
13.86%
|
9.90%
|
9.73%
|
8.75%
|
8.04%
|
10.50%
|
10.76%
|
9.5%
|
|
Jul-09
|
13.81%
|
8.92%
|
9.83%
|
8.43%
|
7.92%
|
10.03%
|
10.52%
|
9.4%
|
|
Aug-09
|
14.54%
|
8.50%
|
9.32%
|
9.16%
|
8.73%
|
12.14%
|
11.49%
|
9.7%
|
|
Sep-09
|
14.25%
|
8.40%
|
9.77%
|
8.69%
|
8.12%
|
10.15%
|
10.72%
|
9.8%
|
|
Oct-09
|
13.22%
|
7.80%
|
9.04%
|
8.54%
|
8.02%
|
8.79%
|
9.04%
|
10.2%
|
|
Nov-09
|
13.00%
|
7.60%
|
9.60%
|
8.98%
|
8.81%
|
10.29%
|
10.56%
|
10.0%
|
|
Dec-09
|
13.53%
|
7.10%
|
10.14%
|
8.68%
|
7.11%
|
9.56%
|
10.32%
|
10.0%
|
|
Jan-10
|
13.25%
|
7.00%
|
10.41%
|
8.58%
|
10.91%
|
9.80%
|
11.07%
|
9.7%
|
|
Feb-10
|
13.51%
|
7.40%
|
10.19%
|
9.11%
|
9.21%
|
11.29%
|
11.08%
|
9.7%
|
|
Mar-10
|
12.54%
|
7.50%
|
10.87%
|
8.51%
|
9.51%
|
11.55%
|
|
9.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Moody's Investment Services, Reuters, Bureau of Labor Statistics
|
|
|
FDCPA Complaints in Perspective
by Gary Baker
There were 78,925 complaints filed on FDCPA violations with the FTC in 2009. The report indicates that nearly half of the complaints filed were about collectors calling either too early or too late in the day, with significant numbers focusing on other "legal technicalities", rather than actual abuses. According to a recent Inside ARM article the numbers reflect complaints and not verifications or resolutions, so they do not tell the full story, and it points out that the industry has a very high "complaint resolution" rate. The bottom line is that it is difficult to know how many complaints were for legitimate abuses. Certainly there are some that are frivolous complaints filed by consumers to avoid paying their debts, and these days, some are even made by lawyers and customers simply to "greenmail" Collection Agencies.
All that aside, however, it is interesting to note just how few complaints there actually are, considering the huge number of calls which are placed each year to collect debts. The statistics show that in 2009, conservatively 835 million phone calls (other sources quote over a billion) were made to collect on past due or charged-off accounts in the United States. This works out to 94.5 complaints per million collection calls, or 1 complaint per 10,583 calls. While all complaints are taken seriously by the Debt Collection Industry, if you consider that half of the complaints were filed on legal technicalities and not on abuses, then the actual number of real transgressions is more accurately below 47 (quite likely ranging from 30-40) offenses per million. When 484 people per million died last year from water related health issues, this is hardly something for the civilized world to make a priority. To put that number in perspective, the odds of dying from a freak accident in the home are greater than of receiving an abusive call from a collector. With lawmakers focused again on consumer protection issues in general, and the CPFA and FDCPA specifically, it would seem that perhaps our bureaucrats have a little to much time on their hands.
In the table below, we have extrapolated data from various sources to determine the number of collection calls that were placed in 2009. Based on the 2006 average household size data that we obtained from the US Census, there were about 7 calls on average made by collection agencies, to every household in America. So the complaint rate by household was one incident per 1498 households in the entire year.
|
% of
|
|
|
Charged-off
|
|
Charge-
|
No.
|
Annual
|
%
|
No. of
|
Annual No.
|
|
Accnts in
|
|
Loss
|
Debt in
|
Avg.
|
off
|
Times
|
Collect
|
Still in
|
Accnts in
|
of Collect'n
|
|
Collections
|
Year
|
Rate
|
Billions
|
Bal.
|
Rate
|
Called
|
Cycles
|
Collect
|
Collections
|
Calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write off
|
2009
|
100%
|
83270000000
|
9858
|
9.23%
|
4.5
|
2
|
94.50%
|
8,446,947
|
76,022,520
|
|
Late
|
2009
|
6.50%
|
8.66E+11
|
9858
|
|
4.5
|
1.5
|
|
5,710,083
|
38,543,061
|
|
Write off
|
2008
|
100%
|
9.58E+11
|
8188
|
5.52%
|
4
|
2
|
80%
|
5,166,742
|
41,333,933
|
|
Write off
|
2007
|
100%
|
9.429E+11
|
7977
|
4.00%
|
4
|
2
|
60%
|
2,836,981
|
22,695,845
|
|
Write off
|
2006
|
100%
|
8.722E+11
|
7379
|
3.64%
|
4
|
1.5
|
40%
|
1,721,102
|
10,326,610
|
|
Write off
|
2005
|
100%
|
8.305E+11
|
7026
|
4.85%
|
4
|
1
|
20%
|
1,146,613
|
4,586,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.70%
|
|
|
|
8381
|
|
|
|
|
25,028,467
|
193,508,421
|
|
|
Home
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgs
|
Delinq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
9.08%
|
|
|
|
10
|
2
|
|
10,772,272
|
19,562,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.70%
|
Auto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,880,351
|
|
42.30%
|
Med-Hosp Healthcare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,375,789
|
|
4.90%
|
Banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,008,070
|
|
12.20%
|
Telecom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,611,930
|
|
0.40%
|
Checks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,265,965
|
|
1.20%
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,797,895
|
|
0.20%
|
Credit Unions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,632,982
|
|
3.10%
|
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,311,228
|
|
8.70%
|
Student Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,034,737
|
|
1.50%
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,247,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 FDCPA Complaints
|
78,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Calls made in 2009
|
835,237,181
|
|
Complaints per Million Calls
|
94.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complaint Rate
|
0.0094494%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One FDCPA complaint per
|
10582.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Households in US (2006)
|
118,207,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Calls per Household
|
7.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sources: US Census, US Bureau of Labor Statistics, ACA International, FDIC, NY Federal Reserve |
Abusive behavior by collectors is unacceptable and certainly should not be tolerated by the industry. There are strict guidelines of behavior in place that the Industry adheres to, and when there is a legitimate violation there are repercussions. But no one ever mentions how many times collectors are verbally abused by the very customers that they call on legitimate business. Who do they get to complain to? Without minimizing how terrible it would be for an individual to be harassed about a debt they might owe, when you consider the phenomenal cost to taxpayers associated with policing and micro-managing the Consumer Debt Collection Industry (i.e. the cost of dealing with complaints, the cost of lawsuits, cost of lawmakers' time, cost of oversight by multiple Government Agencies, etc...and rising!), it would seem that our resources could be better spent, and that this may be more of a molehill than the age of political correctness will let us admit. It leads one to wonder how much per million we are spending as a nation to correct and punish these 47 transgressions, and whether there is a logical point at which the cost to the taxpayer becomes greater than the benefit.
|
|
BRINGING TRANSPARENCY TO WALL STREET
Dylan Ratigan has had some very interesting exposees on his show over the past few weeks. Check them out.
What Wall Street is Hiding , The Big Con , The Goldman Sachs Fiasco
|
$1.0 Trillion Explained
by Gary Baker
One trillion is an enormous number and is very difficult for most of us to quantify in our minds. Our government throws around $1.0 trillion dollars in budgets, and is actually spending one trillion dollars every 103 days. But just how big is this number, and how can we grasp the size of something that we talk about and put it in terms that we can really comprehend?
If you were to look up 1 trillion on Google you would find a great many entries that have tried to explain the size of this number. You can examples that are interesting like: if you could count $1 every second, it would take you 11 ½ days to finish counting out $1.0 million dollars. It would take 32 years to count out $1.0 billion dollars, and 32,000 years to count out $1.0 trillion dollars. Another favorite that we found was that if one person had $1.0 trillion dollars (with no interest) and was to spend $1.0 million every single day, and had been spending that money for the past 2000 years, they still would not run out of money for another 729 years.
With one trillion dollars the total amount of all foreclosed residential properties in 2007 and 2008 could have been purchased. For the same trillion dollars every single home mortgage in the United States could be paid for 14 months or every single rental unit could be paid for over 3 years.
One trillion dollars is one billion, thousand dollar bills. If we were to add up the net worth of the top 51 wealthiest people in the world according to the Forbes 2010 listing (Bill Gates is #2 at $53.0 billion), we would get a total of $1.0 trillion dollars.
We also find a number of graphics on the web that try to illustrate how big a pile of money $1.0 trillion dollars is. See that little red dot in the corner of the graphic below; that is a person.

Another way to visualize this sum of money is by using $1 bills. An average dollar is bill is 4 mils (0.004 inches) thick and if we were to lay $1 million $1 bills edge to edge, they would cover 2.57 acres of land (roughly the playing area of 2 football fields). Now, 1.0 billion looks the same as the million, except that the stack is now 4 inches tall. To visualize one trillion use the same area as the original million on that 2.57 acres of land, and that stack of $1 bills would now be 333 feet tall. Or another example, where we use $100 bills that are stacked on top of each other, we would have a pile that is 789 miles high to equal $1.0 trillion dollars. Of course all these are literally impossible because according to a US Treasury bulletin, as of 12/31/08 there was only $853.6 billion in circulation of US currency.
If we looked at gold as an equivalent, 1.0 trillion dollars is about 1.0 billion ounces of gold or about 33,274 tons which is about one fifth (1/5) of the total amount of gold ever mined in the world. If this $1.0 trillion were put into a big cube of gold, it would measure 40 feet on a side and 40 feet high.
One trillion dollars is roughly the total annual economic output of the Germany, U.K., France, Italy, and Spain combined. Or if you prefer emerging markets, it is the combined annual GDP of Brazil, Russia, India and China.
Let's look at one trillion in another way. One article had a very graphic example where they used 1.0 trillion 4 foot high objects that were stacked one on top of the other. This stack would reach from the earth to the outer rings of Saturn. As we can imagine, one trillion miles is not far if we are measuring the distance to stars. Our closet star (Proxima Centauri) is 4.2 lights year away or 24.6359 trillion miles, (Alpha Centauri is just a little further at 4.4 light years). If we were to travel a trillion miles within our solar system, we could make a round trip to Pluto 133 times.
How to Raise One Trillion Dollars
The population of the United States is about 309 million as of April 2010 and there about 118.2 million households. So if every person in the country were to pay $3236.25, we would have $1.0 trillion dollars. Except that we need far more than one trillion dollars. The National debt now stands at about $12.9 trillion dollars, so we would really need to raise about $41,747 for every man, woman and child in the country to retire the debt, and that is we were to pay it off today.
If we could get help from the rest of the world, what would it take to pay of our debt? There are 6.812 billion people currently alive today, and we were to get a little from each and every person, how much we would we need to pay off this debt? We would need only $1893.72 per person to retire the debt. That is about the annual wage of one quarter of the world's workers. Now imagine that we knew that we were going to have this problem 50,000 years ago, and that we were able to tax every person who has ever been born since then, how much would they have been charged? We would need to determine how many people who ever lived and there are some calculations that appear very credible, although there are obviously many assumptions.
What if we had Taxed Every Person that had ever Lived
"How Many People Have Ever Lived on Earth?" is the most requested Population Today article. It first appeared in February 1995. by Carl Haub (For complete article)
Any estimate of the total number of people who have ever been born will depend basically on two factors: (1) the length of time humans are thought to have been on Earth and (2) the average size of the human population at different periods.
Fixing a time when the human race actually came into existence is not a straightforward matter. Various ancestors of Homo sapiens seem to have appeared at least as early as 700,000 B.C. Hominids walked the Earth as early as several million years ago. According to the United Nations' Determinants and Consequences of Population Trends, modern Homo sapiens may have appeared about 50,000 B.C. This long period of 50,000 years holds the key to the question of how many people have ever been born.
Guesstimates
Guesstimating the number of people ever born, then, requires selecting population sizes for different points from antiquity to the present and applying assumed birth rates to each period (see table). We start at the very, very beginning - with just two people (a minimalist approach!).
How Many People Have Ever Lived On Earth?
|
Year
|
Population
|
Births per 1,000
|
Births Between Benchmarks
|
|
50,000 B.C.
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
|
8000 B.C.
|
5,000,000
|
80
|
1,137,789,769
|
|
1 A.D.
|
300,000,000
|
80
|
46,025,332,354
|
|
1200
|
450,000,000
|
60
|
26,591,343,000
|
|
1650
|
500,000,000
|
60
|
12,782,002,453
|
|
1750
|
795,000,000
|
50
|
3,171,931,513
|
|
1850
|
1,265,000,000
|
40
|
4,046,240,009
|
|
1900
|
1,656,000,000
|
40
|
2,900,237,856
|
|
1950
|
2,516,000,000
|
31-38
|
3,390,198,215
|
|
1995
|
5,760,000,000
|
31
|
5,427,305,000
|
|
2002
|
6,215,000,000
|
23
|
983,987,500
|
|
Number who have ever been born
|
106,456,367,669
|
|
World population in mid-2002
|
6,215,000,000
|
|
Percent of those ever born who are living in 2002
|
5.8
|
Source: Population Reference Bureau estimates.
This semi-scientific approach yields an estimate of about 106 billion births since the dawn of the human race. Clearly, the period 8000 B.C. to 1 A.D. is key to the magnitude of our number, but, unfortunately, little is known about that era. Some scientists may disagree with some aspects, or nearly all aspects of the table, it offers an intelligent approach to determining the answer to this elusive question.
So, the estimate, as of 2002, is that about 5.8 percent of all people who were ever born, are alive today. That's actually a fairly large percentage when you think about it. If everyone who was ever born on Earth had paid only $9.47, we would only have our first $1,000,000,000,000 (1 trillion dollars). And, if our congress could go back in time and tax every single person who has ever been born on this planet, the total tax per person to retire the current national debt would be only $121.18 each. Since 94.2% are dead, and 96.5% that are currently alive, live in other countries, we are going to have to find another way to deal with our spending crisis and with the appauling National debt that we have saddled our future with.
|
|
CREDIT CARD DEBT SHRINKING
Since the beginning of the Recession, Americans have shed $117.1 billion in Credit Card debt according to the latest Federal Reserve statistics released on April 7th. It reflects that the total debt has steadily dropped from $975.2 billion in September of 2008 to $858.1 billion through February of 2010 as people become proactive about paying down old debt and more conservative about incurring new debt. However, in actuality, the biggest decline in the debt has come from the record amount of Charge-offs taken by the Banks, which was over $83 billion last year.
|
|
Financial and Economic Literacy
by Jill Benshoof
If we have learned anything from the current economic crisis, it is that there has been a gaping hole in our understanding of the forces that affect the quality of our lives. The subject of financial and economic literacy has been of interest to us ever since we read Robert Kiyosaki's "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" nearly a decade ago, and realized, for the first time, how negligent we are as a culture in equipping our kids with the tools and skills to prepare them for a successful financial future and allow them to achieve their full potential. One of our personal goals is, ultimately, to do our share in supporting this effort in the future, for kids. Yet, it has taken the current economic crisis to increase our awareness, on a national level, of the importance of financial and economic literacy to the public at large. While even the experts disagree on many things, there is no doubt that much of the difficulties we find ourselves in currently, are in good part the result of a broad naiveté about not just the basics of finances on a personal, City, State and Federal level, but also about the principles of economics. For those of us who have been directly or loosely tied to careers that are rooted in financial businesses, much of our knowledge has come from our own experience, supplemented by research where we have taken a personal interest. There are a multitude of sources of free information on the management of personal finances that have surfaced on line recently and we have shared some at the end of this article. Economic information, however, is not as readily packaged as course material. In the past, High Schools that have offered courses in Economics have often mingled the 2 subjects of finance and economics with varying degrees of success. As of August of 2009, there were only 21 states that had made economics a required course for graduation.
While a bill to provide grant money to promote more financial and economic literacy works its way through Congress, with the global nature of the world economy, more states are recognizing that it is more important than ever to provide our children with the tools to navigate these waters.
It is said that the field of Economics is "the science of decision making". As the country faces critical decisions about the course of its future, it is not lost on many of us how closely the field of politics is tied to economics, and how ill equipped we are as a whole to weigh through and evaluate conflicting opinions and reach intelligent conclusions. It is vital for people to understand the dynamics of the forces that directly affect the quality of their lives. It is far easier to latch onto sound bytes and platitudes from one political party or another, without actually taking the time to research and think things through for ourselves. With the global nature of the world economy and with the fate of our country hanging in the balance, this is not a good position to find ourselves in.
Alice Rivlin, former Vice Chair of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve said in the keynote speech at the Economic Literacy Symposium on May 13, 1999 that Economic literacy is akin to having a working knowledge of a foreign language. In today's world it is more than an academic discipline.
At USC, the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism has recognized that in today's world journalists are handicapped without a comprehensive background in Economics. They
announced in January that they will be adding "numerous courses in the economic realm" to " promote global critical thinking: how to think of this rapidly changing market and empower the students to be market creators."
There are a variety of great resources available on line for free and we thought it would be helpful to provide some information so that those who want to can help themselves and their family members.
Financial Education Sources
-
The U.S Financial Literacy and Education Commission - the U.S. government took a proactive approach to financial literacy back in 2003 with the Fair and accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act. The site is in English and Spanish and it provides information on a variety of topics relating to money management and financial planning. Some of the subjects it covers are budgeting, saving, investing, starting a business, credit, retirement planning and fraud and scams.It also includes some background on history, economic policy, financial markets, financial institutions and on the 19 other federal agencies that coordinate with the commission.
- The U.S. Treasury Department - Also has a site with information set up under the President's Advisory Council on Financial Literacy, created by the Bush administration on January 22, 2008 and given the challenge of improving the financial literacy in the country. The council is involved with researching, and strengthening public and private sector financial education programs. It's mission includes establishing a standard of measure of public financial literacy. The web site includes tips on managing your money in challenging times, as well as a complete curriculum for free, on Money Math Lessons for Life, geared to grades K through 12, with exercises relating to the "Secrets of Becoming a Millionaire".
- 360 Degrees of Financial Literacy - This site contains a compendium of articles on age appropriate education for each of the stages of life, childhood through retirement. It covers such things as college years, career, home ownership, marriage, parenting and dealing with life crises with an array of articles in each category. They also have a financial Guidance Book, State specific information and an "Ask the Money Dr." section inviting you to provide specific questions for personal feedback.
- Practical Money Skills for Life - This is Visa's program developed from their global financial literacy initiative, involving training sessions gear towards a wide range of needs and including tools, resources and an extensive curriculum of lesson plans for educators for all ages. The information is free, but they ask that you register so they have the ability to gauge the effectiveness of their offerings.
- Money Management International
Economic Education Sources
- Bob Parvin: geared toward the average person, this is a basic online course broken down into a variety of subjects such as Capitalism, Markets, Money and Banking, and Trade, to name a few, and it provides an overview of the dynamics of these areas relative to the US Economy.
- The Powell Center for Economic Literacy - this non-profit organization has complete online programs for teachers and students with lessons plans covering a broad curricula for each grade level.
Books
|
The Loan Buyers Group was formed to allow smaller Debt Buyers and Collection Agencies to work together to purchase National files of charged-off debt. The group also partners with larger Debt Buyers for larger portfolio acquisitions. For information on how what we do and how to join, visit our new Website at www.loanbuyersgroup.com. Join us on Linked-In .com/Search Groups/"Loan Buyers Group: National Debt Buyers".
|
|
|
|
|
|